As heard. and then people complain that the anti-political action (cartoons, comments, etc, etc). How can they not receive such treatment?, If a time if, and another also, the laws they are passing through the liner. And as always, acting under and "famosillos" adviser. Because I had the pleasure of observing the double standards that have "these" politicians, with one or the other citizens, because, after having access to a range of urban records requested and after this consultation, was present on behalf of themselves, "were requested for copies of those documents in the same, as provided for in Law 30/1992 of November 26, as amended Law 4 / 1999 of January 13, the "legal regime of public administrations common administrative procedure" (LRJPAC), Article 37.8, must be burned to fire the consultant, to learns, "after a few days, you receive a municipal service signed by, at the time the D. Secretary accidental João Alberto Santos-Carrero of each other that is pitch-leyes, which literally says:
POINT 1 .- agreements.
written reports on the RE 806, 807 date of 16 February 2011, and RE 946 and 947 date 23 February 2011, presented by DNA .............. ..............................., and resident ............... .... A Guard, requesting copies of documents in some cases examined.
The Board of Local Government, as the report of the General Counsel of the City Council recalls its request partially denegarlle accessing only the dispatch of copies of the agreements of the Council Local Governance ou da mayor gives us license to municipal works.
And then as CRA MO TAS large they are, communicate the resources that may be brought, replacement and administrative litigation .. . How they do not pay their pockets lawsuits, viva la Pepa!. A This is called a goose (I hope you do not take it as an insult) and a way of laughing at people, that they both repudiated, and it noisily, in the opposition ... practice it regularly. And then, it seems wrong that they take out bullets and other compromises. If you are looking to constantly!. They are unpresentable because it is also curious as to your "rope", it is insufficient evidence, "they provide all the documents they want, no problem or restriction. Or not, sr. Mayor?. Should we start to give details?. Quiteños doubt.
As for the records consulted, we'll give you an idea of \u200b\u200bhow to work in A Guarda municipally ... for "friends" and / or "associates." Soon we will post the goings that are intended ... if interested, with some. This does not wrinkle
the applicant, dated 14.03.2011, submitted the relevant claim, by appeal optional replacement-first pass-rush, with the intention not to be allowed to continue laughing and doing what they feel like or want, constantly contravening laws. And are supposed to be the authority! ... Authority "of what?. It will be anything but of legality, because that for them there.
In this appeal, reminded that "decisions should be motivated, with brief reference to facts and legal arguments" , which in this case, as in many others, "are obvious (deliberately?). And in relation to the refusal larcial to provide copies of the documents requested are reminded that "Article 105.b of the Constitution of December 27, 1978, Article 4.c of Legislative Decree 2 / 2008 of 20 June, approving the revised Land Law (TRLS/08) and Article 37.1 of the Law 30/1992 of November 26, amended by Law 4 / 1999 of January 13, the Legal Regime of Public Administrations and Common Administrative Procedimento (LRJPAC), in accordance with Article 70.3 of Law 7 / 1985, April 2, Regulation of the Local System (LRBRL) and 207 of RD 2568/1985, of November 28 of the Rules of Organization and Functioning Legal System of Local Authorities (ROF), which come to assert that CITIZENS HAVE THE RIGHT TO ACCESS TO RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS, forms part of a record, held by administrative records ...
And so for the sake of clear and concise manner, the mentioned Article 37 of the same LRJPAC, in paragraph 8, states that "LEAD THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO OR CERTIFIED COPIES OF DOCUMENTS IS UNDER REVIEW PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION AUTHORIZED PAYMENT TO YOU, of the charges are legally established ". Hopefully that will be clear, although those minds ...
As for the records consulted, we'll give you an idea of \u200b\u200bhow to work in A Guarda municipally ... for "friends" and / or "associates." Soon we will post the goings that are intended ... if interested, with some. This does not wrinkle
the applicant, dated 14.03.2011, submitted the relevant claim, by appeal optional replacement-first pass-rush, with the intention not to be allowed to continue laughing and doing what they feel like or want, constantly contravening laws. And are supposed to be the authority! ... Authority "of what?. It will be anything but of legality, because that for them there.
In this appeal, reminded that "decisions should be motivated, with brief reference to facts and legal arguments" , which in this case, as in many others, "are obvious (deliberately?). And in relation to the refusal larcial to provide copies of the documents requested are reminded that "Article 105.b of the Constitution of December 27, 1978, Article 4.c of Legislative Decree 2 / 2008 of 20 June, approving the revised Land Law (TRLS/08) and Article 37.1 of the Law 30/1992 of November 26, amended by Law 4 / 1999 of January 13, the Legal Regime of Public Administrations and Common Administrative Procedimento (LRJPAC), in accordance with Article 70.3 of Law 7 / 1985, April 2, Regulation of the Local System (LRBRL) and 207 of RD 2568/1985, of November 28 of the Rules of Organization and Functioning Legal System of Local Authorities (ROF), which come to assert that CITIZENS HAVE THE RIGHT TO ACCESS TO RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS, forms part of a record, held by administrative records ...
And so for the sake of clear and concise manner, the mentioned Article 37 of the same LRJPAC, in paragraph 8, states that "LEAD THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO OR CERTIFIED COPIES OF DOCUMENTS IS UNDER REVIEW PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION AUTHORIZED PAYMENT TO YOU, of the charges are legally established ". Hopefully that will be clear, although those minds ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment