Birkenstock Frankfurt

With all due respect ... HAVE A NOSE that it PISAN ... (A Guarda)

Who do they think they are trying?. But is it possible that they may believe they can do what they are doing with the judges?. The truth is that they hold ... because the last "feat" of "teacher" is priceless ... but it was answered before the Board.
On 18.11.2010 the Board of Administrative Litigation TSXG by Providence of 12.11.2010, issued to the appellant-performer-statement, the "new trick" the boss of A Guarda Municipal and his court of cronies on the implementation of the eight apartments harmonica in Camposancos (A Guarda). Who I have seen (when he was opposition), and who sees you (now president)!.

And the text, José Manuel Domínguez Freitas rubric such as "O MAYOR", and the content, literally says:

SUBJECT: REGULAR PROCEDURE No. 6020/1996.

"In resposta o seu 24 de Setembro office past, and before the beginning of the new procedures for hiring the writing of project demolition, planteouse the matter settle on what was the situation before the building demolished before the construction of eight apartments on the ground floor that have to be demolished, a matter representation made by this City Council in writing to that room for writing February 26, 2009 and reiterated in writing the date of entry into this room on 28 September. For this reason, we consider necessary and appropriate in order to contract the preparation of a suitable project the true state of the previous building, which will be resolved before such a question before this room Plantex consistent require the applicant to submit the necessary documentation and information about what was the original condition of the property before construction of the flats affected by the demolition order, which also interests through this. We have said so far, proceed to the recovery of the hiring process. "The Watchman, October 20, 2010. Asdo.: Jose Manuel Dominguez Freitas.

Lo dich. Es una manera a" wavering "in Juzgado connected, puesto, if you see that he lied "prof" in it ha been the author of this bullshit nueva, better must have been "concocted" by it current advisor municipal D. Carlos Potel (which one?) - With the handling of the contentious-administrative demand to TSXG, was accompanied by a certificate / report prepared by a Senior Architect, dated 12.12.1996, accompanied four levels (1 - Plano situation; 2 - Situation map volumes, 3 - Ground Floor before 18.12.1992 and 4 - Ground Floor amended), which leaves no doubt what has been done outside the law .. But in this "game" brings the "profession" and CIA, they forget they are dealing with justice ... Banter, the least "professional."

It is also curious which prompted the appellant, on the other hand, "disabled" for public action, they say the mayor, his aides and his cohorts, "they say, for " and convinte deemed necessary, to hire to development or Verdadeiro dun proxecto prior axeitado building do ".. . At this point, one might ask the "teacher" and his advisor, what details were given, then the technical editors of the previous projects that were deserted?. Is that abnormal or want us stupid?. The penalty of this, is that judges sometimes go on hold so many bullshit and stupidity ...

Anyway, have already answered this new "crap" and hope that the Board once put in place, these unpresentable. Lord, in whose hands we are!.