If, if, as we hear. And, no doubt. So do not say alleged, because it is a more than credible "COUNTERFEITING IN AUTHENTIC " and nothing more and nothing less than in the existing General Plan to City Council finally adopted Guarda and modification 29.07.1993 27/12/1996 punctual, "being an irrefutable fact, because the data are clear and concise. And no question of mistake, no. It is a fact, plain and simple, made with the knowledge ... ie, knowing what was "plotting" went beyond the law.
 |
| -Paper presented to justify consolidation over 50% consolidation of the aforementioned core- |
 |
| real-Scope this rural town, reflected in the existing General Plan- |
-It is not, nor is the last time, we have consistently denounced the existence of reports "to letter "- a normal practice that character. And to this very serious indeed, have been sent the corresponding COMPLAINTS, first to the Xunta de Galicia (CMATI) for the annulment of that report, and therefore this agreement / her award / s Covered / s in the same, be all, obviously, a nullity, and second, to which supposedly is the "guarantor of legality"-Mayor of A Guarda, plus Town Planning, "the police report for that is it, who take home, the necessary precautionary measures, after investigation of the facts stated in this complaint, both administrative, civil and / or criminal, against whom holds the post of clerk of municipal and / or technical architect at the Save-A City Council who may appear well as accomplices or abettors, who is the author and signer of the technical report, issued on April 2, 2007, to justify, at the request of the Department of Territorial Policy, Public Works and Transportation, today CMATI - the consolidation of more than 50% in rural communities, in this case Specifically, the so-called "Down Camposancos Beach, in the parish of Camposancos (A Guarda). Indeed, part of it located in the field of Natura 2000 European network ...
 |
| -Overlay both documents, to see the modification criminally- |
And of course, WITHOUT FAULT next Monday, will be formalized this claim-by-appearance, to the anti-corruption prosecutor, so be it, who adopt the measures as may be Instead, prior formalities to be conducted, which were found in a residence of alleged blatant crimes, among other things, falsification of public documents (Article 390) and transgression (art. 404) LO Organic Law 10/1995 of November 23, Penal Code. And
attention, that this "justification" that core building-more than 50% required-is "include" for the "ropes" by the municipal technical, extending the scope of this core rural, 40 m including its area of \u200b\u200bexpansion ... with the aim to "justify" that fell within its ambit a number of buildings, it is finished and inhabited (consolidated) which in fact were clearly out of the aircraft and located entirely on land that rural town, where some of them plainly were within the expansion area, and therefore called by the LOUGA as rustic floors, where residential use is prohibited, or those three plots which had been awarded licenses to build as many houses, which were located in the area of \u200b\u200bthe European Natura 2000 network, not to mention one in particular, located at the place of A Picota in Camposancos (A Guarda)-accompanying photograph, "that was included (especially for add!) to consolidate (see attached photo) ... when in less than a year, that same technician municipal issues A new report, this time of license application to continue its construction and finish, in which he is claiming ...
 |
| - Do you think can be considered as consolidated? ... as well license is being denied to boot? |
"A day hoxe as Recoll na complaint unfinished building is being delivered again by 25% as é as stated maximum concello not delivered again this foi sen to license correspondent ", which results in denying the license ... to finish the building, and therefore found on today in the same state that has more than 20 years ... Which is it, is to consider how to consolidate (as coach), or is unfinished (as it says the same service) and you can end up being located on rural land?.'s the double standards of the technical department!, and is more than possible, that is not the only Falcatruada, but as they say, their "benefactors", is in charge, and does what he says ... Well it's true, because their "arts" and knew who now rule, and no one knows why reason, have stopped taking the measures, both when they were touting the same opposition last election campaign. .. but one thing is quite another plant, to wheat!. We'll see what measures it will take the Mayor, who incidentally, has been one of the "favored" with respect to the works of your home, "because currently there is no trace of the opening of the replacement file of urban law violated by it, in the reform and expansion of your home. All we are saying this is very serious, or rather very serious ... in every way. In testing we refer, and they are compelling and irrefutable.
0 comments:
Post a Comment